kaebess
Active member
Keith Andrews (Head Coach)
are you reminding us all
Yes, he has never got over being correctly called out over his tactics by KA as a pundit, and the resentment continues to simmer away.Interesting night for both managers last night. One was smashing up the scum from Brum and the other was sh*tting the bed in (checks notes) Austria. Martin O'Neill is a w***er who has believed his own hype for far too long. He's just like any other Forest fan, harping on about winning stuff in the 70's and 80's. This was actually before Keith Andrews was born for context.
The same Roy Keane who now has less PL points than Andrews as a manager, despite Andrews managing for ~20 fewer games.Remember, too, that O'Neill's Asst. Mgr. in the ROI job, a certain Roy Keane, also once said this:
"I've heard a lot of bullshitters over the last 10 years and Keith Andrews us up there with the best of them."
This being the same Keane who, when a player, famously had no time for studio pundits himself...
The same Roy Keane who now has less PL points than Andrews as a manager, despite Andrews managing for ~20 fewer games.
The same Roy Keane who now has less PL points than Andrews as a manager, despite Andrews managing for ~20 fewer games.

What I love about KA is all this negative nonsense was thrown at him in interviews when he was first appointed, he didn't rise to the bait but answered the questions politely and shut them down quickly.
He uses 'daily basis' in 'abundance'. I miss the agonised aaarrrgggghhh of a previous incumbent. Excellent head coach is our KA.KA loves a "daily basis"
Used about 4 times in a recent interview.
Can also be alternated with "monthly" or "day to day" basis.
KA was a far better pundit than Keane too.The same Roy Keane who is now more of a comedy act than a football pundit these days.
He rarely puts a foot wrong tbh.Excellent pre Leeds interview.
- and not a word about Jensen missing out…He rarely puts a foot wrong tbh.
you took the words right out of my fingers . We were so dominate the first half that if we werent 2 or 3 up I knew the second half would not be the same . Keith and co should of reacted to their changes and should of expected themA little learning curve there for KA IMO. (very little btw).
So dominant in the first, but needed to react better to the Leeds pressure in the second.
you took the words right out of my fingers . We were so dominate the first half that if we werent 2 or 3 up I knew the second half would not be the same . Keith and co should of reacted to their changes and should of expected them
Amended slightly for you....Yep. Not too sure what the change should have been. But the blatant penalty not being given is where that second half was lost.
I daresay were Bees to play that game again, KA might react differently in the second half.A little learning curve there for KA IMO. (very little btw).
So dominant in the first, but needed to react better to the Leeds pressure in the second.
Also, we needed and deserved to be more than one goal ahead after that first half, and energy levels were perhaps bound to drop in the second half. They just had to go for it - nothing really to lose unless we scored on the break.I daresay were Bees to play that game again, KA might react differently in the second half.
But never forget the old military saying that "The enemy has a vote in every battle." That is, Farke is pretty clever, too, so that it may not be so much that KA did anything "wrong" in the second half - what different subs/tactics would you have used? - but Farke just did better.
Meaning Leeds fans might equally ask: "How did Farke get it so wrong in the first half, that we had to settle for scraping a home draw?" After all, Farke's "second half side" was well able to compete.
Me? I put it down to (a ) it being just the second game, so that while BFC are clearly making an excellent start to the season, not everything "clicks" 100% from the off; (b ) Leeds possibly being better than we have been giving them credit for; and (c )not getting a penalty that might have been awarded on another day.
Agreed and I also find it a bit odd that he'd be expected to hook players who had done so well in the first half. Leeds looked better for sure but they weren't all over us and we were still looking pretty dangerous ourselves. We were a sh*tty refereeing decision away from a perfect away performance.Personally I don't think KA could have done much, it was obvious to anyone who knows about football that Leeds would change it in the 2nd half after being totally out of it 1st half, and I think it's credit to Leeds (I say that very begrudgingly) and Farke that they turned it around like they did.
In the end it was a tale of 2 halves and with the exception of the no penalty that a draw was a fair outcome
Agreed, also had we have had last weeks ref (Michael Oliver) no way would the 4 yellows to us and 0 to Leeds been the order of the day, there shouldn't be a vast difference in Ref's in the Premier League, but yesterday proved there still is.Changing shape, formation and personnel plus getting a rollicking at half time means we were never going to be as comfortable second half. Add the fact that our passing got a little less accurate and Elland Road is no place for the faint hearted. The pen not being awarded was a disgrace, the ref was right there, on MOTD the pundit said it was nailed on. We’ve made a great start, roll on Saturday.
I spoke to a couple of Wolves fans before the game at the Gtech last season, and they mentioned Keith's time at Wolves. They were involved in providing homes for the youngsters.9 mins interview with Kelly Somerset on BBCiplayer “The Football Interview”(series 2).
Not much new, though I didn’t know he was one of 5 x 15yo that came over to Wolves. Only Keith and Robbie Keane made the grade. Nice to hear his story in his own words.
A triple substitution is highly unusual, but the right call for me. Bravo.
it is because he defends them publicly that he can demand so much of them.He treads the line well of being demanding of the players but defensive of them in public.
I’d love to know what he said to them in privateit is because he defends them publicly that he can demand so much of them.
"That's not the kind of chaos I was looking for, lads?"I’d love to know what he said to them in private
Yep, very controlled and measured in his response, but his expression, before he spoke, said everything you needed to know about how he felt.I felt he was at his most self controlled in the interview. Looked very cross and disappointed, I think the players will get that message. Loved the little comment about the refereeing. Top man.
I'm hoping that a defender's 'not great' reputation for defending still makes him a better defender, though, especially with the quality of coaching we can dedicate to him. We're at a level where a number of opponents will have tactics and wingers that demand a top level of full backs. Having the option to play top level defending full backs will be essential for us to progress. It's that simple.Diouff's reputation for defending isn't great either.
In the first half, their number 10 always had acres of space, when he received the ball. I think the reason a combination of Kayode not being on his game and that he was left exposed, because Dango wasn't giving him any cover, so he was caught having to monitor the winger and the man "behind him".Hickey did well and I think Jaidon worked a lot harder than Dango
Time will tell and too early to assess but on course for me yes.Is he a better manager than Thomas Frank?
Is he a better manager than Thomas Frank?