Things Others Say About Brentford FC
Inject. It. Into. My. Veins.
View: https://x.com/the_forty_four/status/2102485516062958036?s=46&t=SQP7mje7Pimu8X-ugPnQnQ
All scripted in advance.
Inject. It. Into. My. Veins.
View: https://x.com/the_forty_four/status/2102485516062958036?s=46&t=SQP7mje7Pimu8X-ugPnQnQ
Inject. It. Into. My. Veins.
View: https://x.com/the_forty_four/status/2102485516062958036?s=46&t=SQP7mje7Pimu8X-ugPnQnQ
Who would do a "pod" with a Fulham fan anyway?The Fulham fan I get, he's just bitter little child.
The Palace fan though, I don't get what his problem is. They've got a massive amount of credit over the last few years and I think most fans have been genuinly impressed by them winning some trophies, although bragging about the Charity Shield is pure cringe.
Complete pair of wetwipes who can't handle clubs other than their own getting some positive press.
Who would do a "pod" with a Fulham fan anyway?
Inject. It. Into. My. Veins.
View: https://x.com/the_forty_four/status/2102485516062958036?s=46&t=SQP7mje7Pimu8X-ugPnQnQ
Inject. It. Into. My. Veins.
View: https://x.com/the_forty_four/status/2102485516062958036?s=46&t=SQP7mje7Pimu8X-ugPnQnQ
Spot on. The news cycle is so fast these days where big stories which used to run for a week might manage a couple of days at best. This inevitably leads to lower quality content being pushed out to fulfill that desire of consumers (who can consume every waking second with the proliferation of social media) for more and more and more.While these tears are delicious, over recent seasons there’s something about the way that the PL is being covered where there has to be some sort of narrative or major conclusion drawn based on very recent events or a handful of games, at almost every stage. I think at this stage last year they were already talking about Bournemouth being in the Champions League.
Us and Brighton do have previous for turning over big teams but it feels like a story this week because of the way the results of game week 5 lined up. But such is the need to generate engagement and views, mid season end of season conclusions aren’t enough
That guys meltdown about on social media is pretty tragic, so anyway back to laughing at that
Oh come on everyone, you missed the impliedAre their tears available for sale?
. They are just having a laugh
Has been posted in Opta thread as well![]()
How Premier League teams have really started - according to expected goals
Which Premier League teams have overperformed their xG and who has underperformed?www.bbc.co.uk
Latest athletic podcast with David Ornstein
Inject. It. Into. My. Veins.
View: https://x.com/the_forty_four/status/2102485516062958036?s=46&t=SQP7mje7Pimu8X-ugPnQnQ
Has been posted in Opta thread as well
"2nd again ..."etc
The reason we are punching above our weight is down to our ownership with Matthew Benham and his ability to recruit incredible talent to assist him and then playing the long game and not looking for short-term results. By any normal metric, we should be nowhere near the Premier League. Our revenues are unlikely to get anywhere near those of many of the so-called big clubs, and hence, if all things were equal, we would not be able to survive. Fortunately, all things are not equal, and many of those clubs are run by a bunch of Muppets that have no understanding of the game or building an organisation with a long-term view. As long as we keep our ownership and as long as those clubs remain trinkets owned by billionaires, our current trajectory remains sustainablewe're in the news every where .They were discussing us on Talksport yesterday . I bet people are hanging arond with pins hoping to burst our bubble . Who knows ,it may burst, maybe we wont be able to sustain what is happening
Agree with all of this.The reason we are punching above our weight is down to our ownership with Matthew Benham and his ability to recruit incredible talent to assist him and then playing the long game and not looking for short-term results. By any normal metric, we should be nowhere near the Premier League. Our revenues are unlikely to get anywhere near those of many of the so-called big clubs, and hence, if all things were equal, we would not be able to survive. Fortunately, all things are not equal, and many of those clubs are run by a bunch of Muppets that have no understanding of the game or building an organisation with a long-term view. As long as we keep our ownership and as long as those clubs remain trinkets owned by billionaires, our current trajectory remains sustainable
Agree, it is never mentioned by the media but we are where we are after approx 14 years. It has been a building process, season after season, sometimes taking 1 step back to go 2 steps forward. Even Arsenal under Arteta it took 6 or 7 years to win the PL. These things take time, it does not happen overnight. Many of the bigger clubs who are underperforming like Spurs, MU, Newcastle, Chelsea etc etc are either not willing, or are incapable, of investing the time that is required to get them back up the ladder. The so called solution is to spend big and sack the manager when it doesnt work out, the way they are set up, and their supporters will not allow a longer term approach. Easy to spend millions on buying players (whether they are suitable or not), a lot harder to change the culture of the club from top to bottom.Agree with all of this.
I also think that it helps that as a fan base we buy in entirely into what MB and PG are doing (for these purposes I’m ignoring the small group of cretins on X) and we are content to build our success incrementally.
Phil Giles has often said that the target each season is to keep on improving. There is no reason to think we won’t keep doing that in the short to medium term which means that European qualification and trophies become much more likely.
...I don't go on other clubs supporters forums...but if I did... I'm fairly certain the GPG would mirror Brightons equivalent...KA talks about us bringing chaos... I'd argue that that's both on and off the pitch where BFC and BHAFC are concerned... especially this season with so many other clubs in the EPL in transition or in turmoil....I guess only really MB and TB know whether this is the right time to capitalise on this...stick or twist.... guess we'll find out....and regardless...both clubs ships are steady as they go.Agree, it is never mentioned by the media but we are where we are after approx 14 years. It has been a building process, season after season, sometimes taking 1 step back to go 2 steps forward. Even Arsenal under Arteta it took 6 or 7 years to win the PL. These things take time, it does not happen overnight. Many of the bigger clubs who are underperforming like Spurs, MU, Newcastle, Chelsea etc etc are either not willing, or are incapable, of investing the time that is required to get them back up the ladder. The so called solution is to spend big and sack the manager when it doesnt work out, the way they are set up, and their supporters will not allow a longer term approach. Easy to spend millions on buying players (whether they are suitable or not), a lot harder to change the culture of the club from top to bottom.
Presumably it's because not that long ago they were in the fourth tierI wonder if Brighton object to being in the triangle, it suits the media because of being a B, but they aren't in the sub 20k capacity and there's several Premier grounds smaller than them?
It's about organisation and management style rather than size of stadium.I wonder if Brighton object to being in the triangle, it suits the media because of being a B, but they aren't in the sub 20k capacity and there's several Premier grounds smaller than them?
Should open to 54m10s... The bitterness from supporters of two teams that look to be in a relegation scrap is palpable
View: https://youtu.be/Y_DY1BP7LL0?t=3250&is=T1j5MQDlwHmjfyrK
At one point in time, we'd won more matches at Stamford Bridge than the current Chelsea manager and his two predecessors combined.Not going to comment on the size of his ring, but he too has also forgotten that same pasting, so to only lose 3-0 is probably 'the best from Chelsea' (better than 1-4 at home) - and didn't we win another match there as well?
Inject. It. Into. My. Veins.
View: https://x.com/the_forty_four/status/2102485516062958036?s=46&t=SQP7mje7Pimu8X-ugPnQnQ
So is the reason they cut down our Trees because we beat them? Just asking!I was down by Brentford Library yesterday, talking to the tree surgeons why they had cut the trees down?
They noticed my Bees shirt, they said that they were Chelsea supporters.
Both were unhappy with Chelsea's recruiting and quality of new players.
Said that Brentford deserved the win, and the Bees recruitment model works with them not paying OTT transfer fees.![]()
....ironically wearing 'New Balance' - how do blokes like these get podcasts/followers?
We've won there three times out of five so far. I think we could be on for a fourth this season.Two blokes who really know their history
Black guy "This is the first time they've beaten us since they CAME BACK into the Premier League"
I think he's forgotten the pasting they took at 'The Bridge of Sighs', even after we gave them a Rudiger goal headstart - and we haven't come back into the PL, we've never left it
White guy " we as fans deserve to expect the best from Chelsea" "Brentford is a club that is no bigger than my ring......"
Not going to comment on the size of his ring, but he too has also forgotten that same pasting, so to only lose 3-0 is probably 'the best from Chelsea' (better than 1-4 at home) - and didn't we win another match there as well?
Let's hope we're still in the title race on the final dayWe've won there three times out of five so far. I think we could be on for a fourth this season.
Yeah, what was the reason??So is the reason they cut down our Trees because we beat them? Just asking!
Saucony is Fulhamish clobberWhat’s wrong with New Balance?
Most of the “dressers” that I know. Over 50s obviously, so previous Adidas devotees, now wear Saucony or New Balance.

Saucony is Fulhamish clobber![]()
The only time I have seen Saucony trainers have been on middle class dads in salmon shorts and yummy mummy's in yoga pants.The Shadow series- Original-5000-6000, and the Jazz are top tier.
I’m not referring to the running shoes.
How very dare you.

.... you obviously don't frequent the East Stand that often.The only time I have seen Saucony trainers have been on middle class dads in salmon shorts and yummy mummy's in yoga pants.
![]()
Come on. They punch horses up there.(One thing that did surprise me a bit, was how little opposition there was to his views from other fans of Newcastle. Thought there might be a few intelligent/fair minded ones out there. Clearly I overestimated the fan base!!!)
Mongo impressedCome on. They punch horses up there.
Dad's Army at HullOur squad looks pretty well loaded with peak age players. Joint highest with Leeds, Arsenal a touch behind.
View attachment 69316
Our squad looks pretty well loaded with peak age players. Joint highest with Leeds, Arsenal a touch behind.
View attachment 69316
He's the 1.8%Erm wouldn't Callum Wilson be classed as a veteran?
He's the 1.8%
He's 34, they've set over 34.1 as veteran.Erm wouldn't Callum Wilson be classed as a veteran?
The size of stadium is much less important then previously because gate receipts are now a much smaller part of a clubs overall income. TV money is king and commercial income not so far behind.It's about organisation and management style rather than size of stadium.
I'm reminded (someone will know the quote) that MB once said he was focused on 5 years ahead and the decisions to be made while others were responsible for the shorter-term operational decisions.
Sheffield Wednesday and Preston North End are still regarded as 'big clubs' in any conversation with supporters of those mediocre clubs offended by the 3 B's!The size of stadium is much less important then previously because gate receipts are now a much smaller part of a clubs overall income. TV money is king and commercial income not so far behind.
But a big stadium full of fans is highly visible and impresses supporters of "big" clubs more than it deserves to. Most of them are simply ignorant of football economics.
Sixty-five years since Preston were last in the top division. 88 since they actually won anything.Sheffield Wednesday and Preston North End are still regarded as 'big clubs' in any conversation with supporters of those mediocre clubs offended by the 3 B's!
Is that true? Clubs with big stadiums, like spurs, can generate more from their stadium than from tv revenue. The two combined make a big difference when it comes to PSR. Otherwise why would so many PL clubs be investing in their stadiums? The question is will adding 10k seats and a few extra boxes to the gtech make a meaningful difference once you’ve accounted for build costs. I imagine not.The size of stadium is much less important then previously because gate receipts are now a much smaller part of a clubs overall income. TV money is king and commercial income not so far behind.
But a big stadium full of fans is highly visible and impresses supporters of "big" clubs more than it deserves to. Most of them are simply ignorant of football economics.