That’s because none of them saw it as they were all focused on the incoming corner you turnip!No one complained so I guess that says it all![]()
Presumably yehor was aware and he didn't complain eitherThat’s because none of them saw it as they were all focused on the incoming corner you turnip!
I’m pretty sure I read something after the end of last season whereby they were going to put a stop to all the argy bargy in the penalty area before the corner is taken. I can’t see any change at all, in fact Liverpool yesterday took it to another level!Whilst I cannot argue about the sentiments that you express so eloquently what currently happens when teams flood the box in the way Liverpool did today on numerous occasions is in my opinion very one sided in favour of the attacking side. If the attacking side overstep the mark, and commit a foul, the referee blows his whistle, the free kick is taken, and the game moves on. If the reverse occurs, and the defending team commits a foul then a penalty is awarded, and the game changes. Whilst it was not a penaly
decision today the principle remains, and the referee should have intervened long before the situation was allowed to develop as it did. This tactic of overloading the box is designed to achieve exactly what did today. This is cheating and referees should put a stop to it.
It also needs to be remembered that football, especially lower leagues was a different game in those days when teams needed a hard man. Back in those times players didn't cheat either!My favourite all time Bees player, who could also play a bit…
This 100%. Looking at man not ball as Jacquet did is a punishable offence. You can see YY appealing to the ref, who did nothing. Rrfs are expressly instructed to crack down on this this season, Brooks did nothing. YY gets a red all day long, but Jacquet and possibly VD should gave got yellows too. Ref just views a VAR snip that provides no context.I’m pretty sure I read something after the end of last season whereby they were going to put a stop to all the argy bargy in the penalty area before the corner is taken. I can’t see any change at all, in fact Liverpool yesterday took it to another level!
If the ref had sorted out the mess beforehand during the corner, then Yarmo doesn't get baited.This 100%. Looking at man not ball as Jacquet did is a punishable offence. You can see YY appealing to the ref, who did nothing. Rrfs are expressly instructed to crack down on this this season, Brooks did nothing. YY gets a red all day long, but Jacquet and possibly VD should gave got yellows too. Ref just views a VAR snip that provides no context.
That was my view of it. I said at the time that we really missed Collins who A) would've got involved earlier with Jacquet's barging and B) been at the referee earlier, as captain, and more forcibly.If the ref had sorted out the mess beforehand during the corner, then Yarmo doesn't get baited.
They seem utterly incapable of following through on how they say laws are going to change or be interpreted. IMO, the biggest positive change they could make would be retrospective punishment for obvious cheating, by which I mean retrospective yellow and red cards. They have all the tools with VAR to do this during the match but don't use them.I’m pretty sure I read something after the end of last season whereby they were going to put a stop to all the argy bargy in the penalty area before the corner is taken. I can’t see any change at all, in fact Liverpool yesterday took it to another level!
You've overlooked the fact that none of that applies to "Big" clubs.I’m pretty sure I read something after the end of last season whereby they were going to put a stop to all the argy bargy in the penalty area before the corner is taken. I can’t see any change at all, in fact Liverpool yesterday took it to another level!
Yehor was complaining like mad about all the argy-bargy that led up to the incident.Presumably yehor was aware and he didn't complain either![]()
ExfuckingactlyIf the ref had sorted out the mess beforehand during the corner, then Yarmo doesn't get baited.
Even at the point where the so-call headbutt took place, Yarmo was still appealing to the ref with arms up.
....have you actually seen what happened....he was defending himself from what he thought was an imminent attack from Jacquet...if BFC don't appeal this imo opinion THEY and not Jacquet are the cowards..... roll over FC.
The ref is not seeing the incident in perspective. YY gets red sure. But he should have taken action in the build up, or minimum yellow carded Jacquet for his offence too.If it was John McGinn last week against us we would’ve wanted a red. Would he have got one, of course not.
You can’t lose all perspective just because it’s our player and the Liverpool guy was on the wind up.
Unfortunately, I think that if we start doing that, we will end up with more yellow cards for simulation than our opponents ever will.Yep, and I keep seeing about how we take the next step, and how f***ing ridiculous is it, that for us to make the next step, we need to up our sh*thousing and cheating ! This league is so f***ed
Completely agree. The idea that because a referee (or the VAR) is deemed to have seen an incident means that no further action can be taken later on is a nonsense.the biggest positive change they could make would be retrospective punishment for obvious cheating, by which I mean retrospective yellow and red cards
If you’ve got a ex player in the Var room all day they are saying just have a word with the pair of them.
If it's the one I'm thinking off, it's completely false. The only comment from Yehor was his insta update.Just read Yehors long statement about it -must admit he made an old man close to tears
If its the one I'm thinking off, it's completely false. The only comment from Yehor was his insta update.
There's a new Twitter fad of accounts posting long made up quotes. There's a Keith Andrews one from the sane account which is b***ocks too. In Yehor's case, I doubt he knows enough English to make a statement that long.
His first mistake was he didn’t go down like wardley when he got shoulder barged by Jaqcuet
Naive play by YY
Yarmo never touched him.Send Jacquet to me,I will show him what a headbutt really feels like.Trust me he won't get up.The referees should have the guts to conclude that notwithstanding any red card, that was an obvious simulation with intent to deceive the match officials.
He went down like he’d been caught by a sniper. Cheating pure and simple
If you indicate that you were trying to head a ball you use a 'headbutting' action too.Will Brooks send people off for that too?I agree with your interpretation of the rules but you need to establish contact before you can determine whether it was negligible.
This was the announcement of the referee:
REF: “After review, the Brentford No.6 commits a headbutting action. The final decision is a red card”.
The ref does not say there was a headbutt. Only there was a head butting action. The latter is not a violent conduct offence.
Force.I’m saying if you don’t think it’s a penalty your Brentford bias is warping reality and there’s no point discussing. He pushed his head into him with force. It was stupid and ruined the game for us
He brilliant,he dominated other players by his style & prescence.They were scared of him...I never saw him playing for Brentford Football Club...so I can't comment on that.
The ban for a sending off covers all games.Will he miss the Sunderland game?or is it just league games he’s banned for
Can’t believe I have just read that.... it's funny bordering on sad...but some of you lot on here were making comparisons with this young fella and Terry Hurlock but a few days ago... Hurlock was an animal...a thug...he wasn't hard FFS...he was a coward....I saw him getting sent off for Rangers v Celtic at Parkhead...he wasn't a footballer FFS...he just kicked other players....a spoiler at best perhaps...you want to compare YY with Hurlock after what's happened today.... right you are.
Anyone notice the left back for them yesterday and his throws especially second half.
Both feet off the ground!!!!
Outstanding from the lino![]()
...so I've heard... anywayHe brilliant,he dominated other players by his style & prescence.They were scared of him

They’re so busy counting to 5 the ref and assistants are not spotting foul throws. Watched the end of the Everton Chelsea game and pretty much ever throw Chelsea took on the right Acheapong lifted his footI was saying that as well! Looked like a basketball throw.
Incredible amount of deflecting going on here. Make all the excuses you want but the underlying problem was YY allowing himself to be goaded into headbutting someone.As with just about everything else during the game the underlying problem re the sending off was the ref's failure to do his job when Jacquet behaved like a thug.
The point is, Yarmoliuk probably wouldn't have done what he did if the ref had done his job. That's not condoning Yarmoliuk's action.Incredible amount of deflecting going on here. Make all the excuses you want but the underlying problem was YY allowing himself to be goaded into headbutting someone.
It’s not just the ref who didn’t do his job, it was also YY unfortunately.The point is, Yarmoliuk probably wouldn't have done what he did if the ref had done his job. That's not condoning Yarmoliuk's action.
Another disaster of a rule. It seems you can take as long as you like to get to the ball, take a few seconds more to prepare then you get the visual cue and end up throwing on 1. Nobody is going to get pulled up when it's that easy to manipulate.They’re so busy counting to 5 the ref and assistants are not spotting foul throws. Watched the end of the Everton Chelsea game and pretty much ever throw Chelsea took on the right Acheapong lifted his foot
Which is quite clearIt’s not just the ref who didn’t do his job, it was also YY unfortunately.
Read what Andrews and Yarmoliuk said about this incident and you'll realise that isn't the point. Neither mentioned the actions or lack of actions of Jacquet or the ref. Andrews specifically said it's not about the officials it's about our player. Yarmoliuk took full responsibility. If only more supporters, and managers and players at other clubs, were similarly honest when they're in the wrongThe point is, Yarmoliuk probably wouldn't have done what he did if the ref had done his job. That's not condoning Yarmoliuk's action.
I would like to see a separate timekeeper with a stopwatch giving the paying public 90 minutes of football. The argument against is games with last much longer but Sky etc., who run the game , will pressure the officials into cutting down on time wasting because it will mess with the programming schedules.Another disaster of a rule. It seems you can take as long as you like to get to the ball, take a few seconds more to prepare then you get the visual cue and end up throwing on 1. Nobody is going to get pulled up when it's that easy to manipulate.
Refs are not able to stop it unless they stand in the 6 yard box with the players.It happens multiple times in nearly every game,they stop the action and speak to players but it continues immediately after they walk away.The point is, Yarmoliuk probably wouldn't have done what he did if the ref had done his job. That's not condoning Yarmoliuk's action.
Keith always makes the point of not commenting on things out of his control eg. incompetent officials. Yehor followed the same policy. Fortunately the paying public don't have to follow that policy and can call out cheating and inept officials.Read what Andrews and Yarmoliuk said about this incident and you'll realise that isn't the point. Neither mentioned the actions or lack of actions of Jacquet or the ref. Andrews specifically said it's not about the officials it's about our player. Yarmoliuk took full responsibility. If only more supporters, and managers and players at other clubs, were similarly honest when they're in the wrong
Ok. I will say it. I f***ing hate sh*t housery from anyone and was embarrsed with us at Wolves in our first premier league season as an example.On the one hand we are giving Jacquet grief and on the other suggesting Yarmo should have been more cute...
He made a stupid error and gave VAR a decision when we were in the ascendancy, but he's not the first and won't be the last player. He's got plenty of credit in the bank as long as he learns from it.
Particular shame at that time in the game as felt we would have come away with all 3 points especially given our subs bench.