NOTICE Notice: This is an old thread. The last post was 289 days ago. If your post is not directly related to this discussion please consider making a new thread.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 250

Thread: Banned From GPG

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    The Beautiful South
    Posts
    15,367
    Threads
    633
    Posts You Liked
    60
    35 Likes for 22 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SpiderBee View Post
    Mori quote on facebook to me.


    "the moderators on GPG are lying. I had no pm,no warning.no reason,no length of time. All I was trying to do was post a warning about facebook which involved other Bees. My messages kept disappearing and I thought it was me doing it on phone. I went to desk top to send Bannana a message about someone deleting my threads and found I was barred whilst actually doing this message. No reason given just two messages saying a 1 point infraction then a minute later a message saying 100 point infraction. These arrived as I was typing my pm to banana which then wouldnt send cos I was barred. If people dont like me they should say so but they are lying on the GPG cos they know I cant get back at them. After 53 years of following Brentford,after all the work my parents did for nothing,the support of both my grandads and on great grandad I feel like walking away. These people have no balls".
    But there were actually posts on here from those who run the site telling him to calm it numerous times. They weren't private. They're here in the public domain for all to see, telling him he's posting at a ridiculous level about the same topic with the same view.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    London
    Posts
    43,059
    Threads
    2953
    Posts You Liked
    597
    1,198 Likes for 530 Posts
    Oh my God. People get into such a tizz. I will get in touch with moribee in due course, he can also get in touch with me via the "Contact Us" facility.

    I've never publically discussed the reasons for people having to take a holiday. I've don't believe that that is the right way to go about things. I'd rather keep it a personal dialogue. I've seen other boards have announcements about who has been banned and giving chapter and verse on the reasons why. I doubt any of those posters would want to come back under those circumstances.

    To answer a few more points. Annoying Banana is not a reason for getting banned. Taking-over the messageboard with a single-agenda item is a reason for getting banned (see Forum Rules under spamming). In short if you are posting more than one in every (say) 10-20 messages on a thread then perhaps one should use the self-moderation feature. I do try and gently point-out to individuals when this happens, some get the joke and others blindly carry on.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    33
    Posts You Liked
    113
    97 Likes for 64 Posts
    Its a real shame anyone has to be banned but I cant deny that certain repeated posting has been more than irritating recently. For some reason, quite possibly due to the postponed games, there has been a lot of posts that felt very personal towards certain individuals and far more concerningly towards the club. I hope whomever has been banned did get a PM and a chance to calm down but rules are rules and are generally necessary.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    nr Prague, Czech Rep
    Posts
    24,196
    Threads
    275
    Posts You Liked
    1,325
    366 Likes for 265 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sweepy View Post
    In summary, the word trolling is officially over-used. Save it for when I actually am trolling, though that is more associated with my old style of posting.
    sorry but i do notice a lot of your posts contain jibes like this, and i do think it's done to get a reaction.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    nr Prague, Czech Rep
    Posts
    24,196
    Threads
    275
    Posts You Liked
    1,325
    366 Likes for 265 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Banana View Post
    Taking-over the messageboard with a single-agenda item is a reason for getting banned (see Forum Rules under spamming). In short if you are posting more than one in every (say) 10-20 messages on a thread then perhaps one should use the self-moderation feature.
    uh-oh *fears for the future of "The Basketball Thread"*

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Chessington
    Posts
    9,196
    Threads
    76
    Posts You Liked
    952
    481 Likes for 308 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Owlsmoor_Bee View Post
    They aren't and to be knowledge never have been.
    That's fine then. All sorted.

    Quote Originally Posted by wanderer paul View Post
    Name the posters you think are banned then because they've been negative. Name one.
    How would i know who is banned? I just said if they were being banned for being negative that it would be wrong.
    The future's bright, the future's Brentford !

  7. #57
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Guildford, Surrey
    Posts
    5,062
    Threads
    91
    Posts You Liked
    54
    375 Likes for 198 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sweepy View Post
    How great we now have a happy place where fewer people than ever are around to question anything. Now what did I do with my white wig and membership of the BFC Communist Party for Socialised Football?


    For what it's worth I think RoB is a know-it-all bore on the GPG and also when I'm sitting in his vicinity at GP. However, I didn't think he did anything that warranted a ban.

    I think it's quite sad that people aren't bothering to post on here any more because every time they dare question the status quo they are shot down in flames with the intention of being made to feel inferior.
    "Don't act like you're not impressed...."

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Hillingdon
    Posts
    9,202
    Threads
    16
    Posts You Liked
    339
    1,040 Likes for 655 Posts
    Issue them with a GPG ASBO !!

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Here, there and everywhere......
    Posts
    2,576
    Threads
    44
    Posts You Liked
    470
    395 Likes for 235 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthamptonBee View Post
    I'm not banned.

    Nana wouldn't do that, he's a good guy apart from that Welsh rugby crap......

    I started allowing the GPG to wind me up, got into a war of words with someone which wasn't doing anyone any favours, got a few laughable threatening pms and decided that the www is a strange place.

    No more gaskets blown over team choices in the "team for Saturday" that include Woodman after yet another fine Bidwell performance, no more shock at 5 more posts in the Grella thread after Clayton has put in a good display etc etc.

    I lost a lot of my Brentford mojo with Scott and haven't got it back yet, I know a fair few feel the same, no thought of going to Colchester etc, booking a holiday in Feb without caring who we were playing, I'm sure it will return one day. I feel that following BFC at the moment is a bit of a going through the motions hobby, it should be more than that.

    Much love.
    Your just going through the menopause. Don't worry you'll come through it and be back to your old self in no time.......... I went through it in the late 80's and even left the country for nearly a decade. I'm now back to my old 'It's Brentford innit' self now. Have faith.......
    'Concrete jungle, the animals are after me'

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Camberley Surrey
    Posts
    13,200
    Threads
    970
    Posts You Liked
    512
    1,087 Likes for 448 Posts
    If they ban many more they might as well shut it down, doesn't look like many post these days in any case.

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Brentford
    Posts
    24,289
    Threads
    221
    Posts You Liked
    217
    2,109 Likes for 1,212 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenholme Bee View Post
    If they ban many more they might as well shut it down, doesn't look like many post these days in any case.
    There have been 4 recently who have been put on 'gardening leave'. Others that don't post anymore do so out of choice but I bet they read it still.
    When life gives you a 100 reasons to cry,show life that you have a 1000 reasons to smile

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    wherever the fancy takes me...
    Posts
    3,540
    Threads
    161
    Posts You Liked
    11
    166 Likes for 93 Posts
    Is it me or are there fewer and fewer posters these days?

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    34,064
    Threads
    1066
    Posts You Liked
    477
    2,293 Likes for 1,061 Posts
    One of the great untruths is that we (the moderators) are constantly banning people. It doesn't matter how many times we say it doesn't happen, the myth remains. I suppose it supports people like Sweepy's view that it's the case but I'm afraid it's not. I challenged Sweepy a few weeks ago to share with everyone how many times I'd banned him / anyone else because he suggested that I might ban him again because of a particular post.

    He didn't respond of course (the facts would have been getting in the way of a bad argument) but I would like to point out apart from obvious spammers I can't recall banning anyone in the last couple of years, particularly Sweepy whose posts can usually be comfortably ignored.
    I intend to live forever. So far, so good.

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Queen's County
    Posts
    6,568
    Threads
    278
    Posts You Liked
    76
    1,144 Likes for 614 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenholme Bee View Post
    If they ban many more they might as well shut it down, doesn't look like many post these days in any case.
    I think you'll find you could count the number of users who've been banned over the past couple of years on the fingers of one hand.

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Ashford
    Posts
    18,938
    Threads
    217
    Posts You Liked
    26
    731 Likes for 545 Posts
    im not surprised Mori was banned, his posts were tedious and constantly referring to wars, how animals are better than humans and Terry should be able to say what he liked.I found ROB posts quite interesting although a bit long

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    The Beautiful South
    Posts
    15,367
    Threads
    633
    Posts You Liked
    60
    35 Likes for 22 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Guildford Bee View Post


    For what it's worth I think RoB is a know-it-all bore on the GPG and also when I'm sitting in his vicinity at GP. However, I didn't think he did anything that warranted a ban.

    I think it's quite sad that people aren't bothering to post on here any more because every time they dare question the status quo they are shot down in flames with the intention of being made to feel inferior.
    Agreed. The thing with ROB is a lot of what happens here happens in dialogue, not just one person ranting to an unresponsive audience. So ROB had long become tiresome, but if kept going because those he digs at kept responding to it. I've started to learn to ignore stuff, especially when those posts are by people I've tangled with previously. It's too easy to keep grudges going indefinitely.

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Brentford
    Posts
    689
    Threads
    5
    Posts You Liked
    25
    24 Likes for 17 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sweepy View Post
    but if kept going because those he digs at kept responding to it.
    Exactly. I don't understand what is meant by 'trolling' or 'spamming' but ROB responded to people responding and rarely with the same comment. Same point maybe but not the same comment. This is sometimes required on here as some are so quick to jump on the defensive that they don't actually read what has been written. It has actually happened in this thread already. I've seen few (if any) posts from ROB where he's just had post after post of ranting. He normally responds with quotes of those responding to him. He may not 'get it' but I wouldn't consider that any more controversial or breach of c of c than people constantly banging on about ... bringing Ryan Dickson back (for example).

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    34,064
    Threads
    1066
    Posts You Liked
    477
    2,293 Likes for 1,061 Posts
    Getting abusive emails now - look what you've all started .......
    I intend to live forever. So far, so good.

  19. #69
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Camberley
    Posts
    420
    Threads
    9
    Posts You Liked
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I wish everyone would grow up.
    Its not a FORUM if you cant give your opinion or let others have theirs. Not everyone will agree with everything.
    Learn to listen to others and let everyone speak. Just my opinion.
    Its CHRISTMAS not Holiday Season. Dont like it go live elsewhere.

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    34,064
    Threads
    1066
    Posts You Liked
    477
    2,293 Likes for 1,061 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Les Beeavinu View Post
    Getting abusive emails now - look what you've all started .......

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Windlesham
    Posts
    28,741
    Threads
    1207
    Posts You Liked
    1,070
    800 Likes for 427 Posts
    It was all ok until WP became a mod
    Everything is as it's meant to be

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Trotta Terrace
    Posts
    9,354
    Threads
    186
    Posts You Liked
    447
    1,124 Likes for 756 Posts
    No issue with terms and conditions or how they are enforced. If people are to stupid to calm down after a gentle reminder then frankly they deserved to get banned.

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Old Malden, actually......
    Posts
    2,923
    Threads
    43
    Posts You Liked
    381
    402 Likes for 180 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Les Beeavinu View Post
    One of the great untruths is that we (the moderators) are constantly banning people. It doesn't matter how many times we say it doesn't happen, the myth remains. I suppose it supports people like Sweepy's view that it's the case but I'm afraid it's not. I challenged Sweepy a few weeks ago to share with everyone how many times I'd banned him / anyone else because he suggested that I might ban him again because of a particular post.
    Would it help to overcome this suspicion if there was a running total of 'currently suspended' next to the number of members on the front page? No names required.
    First they came for the communists.........

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    34,064
    Threads
    1066
    Posts You Liked
    477
    2,293 Likes for 1,061 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Garybaldbee View Post
    Would it help to overcome this suspicion if there was a running total of 'currently suspended' next to the number of members on the front page? No names required.
    We've discussed this before and decided against it. The numbers would be distorted by the users who just join to spam the site.

    PS : I realise that I banned an away fan recently so my "no ban" post was incorrect. Gloating away fans annoy the **** out of me.
    I intend to live forever. So far, so good.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Brentford
    Posts
    24,289
    Threads
    221
    Posts You Liked
    217
    2,109 Likes for 1,212 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Oak View Post
    I wish everyone would grow up.
    Its not a FORUM if you cant give your opinion or let others have theirs. Not everyone will agree with everything.
    Learn to listen to others and let everyone speak. Just my opinion.
    There are guidelines to abide by. Keep within those and you or anyone can have their say. It's not too hard to understand.
    When life gives you a 100 reasons to cry,show life that you have a 1000 reasons to smile

+ Reply to Thread

Members who have read this thread : 422

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
<-- Google -->